It’s Christmas in July – so we’re gonna roll with it.
So alllll the way back in Nov and December (yes, I’ve been
thinking abut this well on half a year,) I found myself chatting with a good
number of folks about Operation Christmas Child. If you’ve never heard of
Operation Christmas Child (OCC), this post might be a little irrelevant, but
I’ll still explain that OCC is a ministry of Samaritans Purse, which
distributes gift-filled shoe boxes to needy children in more than 100
countries. The children receiving the shoe boxes are given a gospel
presentation and invited to learn more.
Many of the conversations I had this past winter were with
Christians, genuinely interested in my perspective on OCC and its operations. Because
mobilization for church-wide, participatory events like OCC happen well in
advance, this conversation is almost perennially relevant; and with thousands
of Churches getting in on the action, I am glad that the people around me are
asking thoughtful questions about best practices and methodology.
The truth is, I love
that Operation Christmas Child is so effective at mobilizing first-world
Christians on behalf of the global poor. I love
that whole churches rally and do something not-selfish at this super-selfish
time of year. I love that whole
families get involved, from the box-prep to the shopping to the letter writing
to the shipping. (My own family did this too when I was growing up!) I love that American kids are given the
opportunity to leave the “give me, give me!” bubble and think about poverty and
injustice. I love the heart of
wanting to reach the world’s little ones with Good News.
LOVE.
But… (Oh, you
knew there was a but coming…)
But then April happened and the love started to wane. It was
in April that Jeremy was preparing for the regional pastors conference that we
were hosting. We had invited a visiting lecturer from America to come and teach
and had spent boku bucks getting everything ready for the nearly 100 pastors that
were registered to attend… And then… the day before the conference started,
Operation Christmas Child reps showed up in the town nearest us and announced
to all of the pastors of the region that they were needed in order to
distribute several thousand shoe boxes. (Christmas
shoe boxes… in April… whatev.) This
untimely maneuver jacked from us about two thirds of our conference attendees.
Thanks, Christian ministry, for stepping all over a brothers toes.
Christians wrecking a pastors conference felt a little more
than “untimely and discourteous” and I went all whistle blower in front of my
laptop because, by gum, I have words.
I’ve long held back my true feelings about OCC, but April’s
distasteful situation begged for at least a little stirring of the pot. I
seriously considered: what with over 10 million shoe boxes expected to go out
this year, I can’t help but think about just how many of my friends and family
are invested in OCC, and how many of them want to do good, and not harm, for
the name of Christ in the world.
Thankfully, Christmas in July is a thing in this country, so
I’ll take this opportunity to just come right out and say it: I’m deeply uncomfortable
with the mashup of Christmas presents and the gospel. My complaint is
simplistic, but I think its significant enough to warrant rethinking at least
something about those 10 million shoe boxes.
I know many Christians wrestle with our culture’s gift
obsession at Christmas time. We are celebrating Christ’s birth, the coming of
the Redeemer, Emmanuel, God with us, and somehow that gets translated practically
into gimme gimme gimme shop shop shop buy buy buy consume hoard overload and
what have you. The central figure of the season is not a baby in a manger but
boxes under a tree – a reality which makes us all feel uncomfortable, and yet
at the same time we do little more than give “Jesus is the reasons for the season” posters a bit of real estate
in our front yards.
We don’t like it, we wring our hands over it, and still, we export it. Operation Christmas
Child. I heard it many times as a young girl – “Think of all those poor children out there who aren’t getting anything
for Christmas!” I pictured sad looking children sitting on the floor on
Christmas day, longing for a present to unwrap. I was taught to be particularly
grateful for the material goods in my life. I simply figured that one could not
be happy without the stuff. And I learned
to pity those without it.
I think many of us in the Western world have
been led to believe that the equation of more presents equals happiness is an
absolute truth. No stuff, no happy. Materialism
is the air we breathe and it is no surprise that it has worked its way into the
way we do ministry.
If I take the gift idea a step further though – out of the
realm of the materialistic world-view and into the practical, I have to ask a
simplistic question: Why does the third world need boxes of trinkets and
doo-dads anyway? I mean, apart from their inherent and existential happiness,
WHY do all the little children of the world so desperately need the contents of
those boxes such that we’ve elevated their importance to the level of dying
people relief rations. When I think about the things I used to pack in my
childhood OCC box – socks, pencils, cheepo-toys, I realize all of those things
can be purchased in the Mansa market, for a fraction of the cost and without
the $7 shipping. And speaking of cheepo toys, I think at least some American
box senders need to repent on this one. Remember when we talked about “betterthan nothing” being euphemism for crap? Mhhm. Case. In. Point. I read a
Washington Post article not long ago advising moms who are tired of all the
junkety junk their kids bring home from birthday parties to take half those
unwanted party favors and shove them in an Operation Christmas Child Box. (I was loving the article until I to to #8... and then I threw up a little in my
mouth.)
So we export Christmas-time materialism in the form of
stocking stuffers, misrepresenting it as useful aid, and then what? We bait it
on a hook and lure kids in to get them to listen to a gospel presentation. We’ve
witnessed enough give-aways in Fimpulu and surrounding villages to know that
“free stuff” has an almost irresistible effect on people of all ages. It
doesn’t even matter what it is; poverty mentality hypnotically drives people to
go to do whatever it takes to get the “free stuff,” and OCC capitalizes on that
dynamic.
we had to learn the hard way that even silly little things - if given for free free - can create a frenzy |
When “stuff” is on the line, people have learned to do and
say whatever is necessary to assure that they are the beneficiaries of the
stuff-giving program. Raise my hand and ask lots of questions? I can do that!
Check a box? Sure thing! Say a prayer? Join a Bible study? Well, why not? OCC-ers
may never say, “IF you accept Jesus
we will give you presents.” But I don’t think they have to. The linkage is made
the moment those boxes come through the door and that’s motivation enough to
“get saved” as many times as is necessary to make sure they miss out on no good
thing.
Deeper and deeper does this drive the momentum of the
prosperity gospel across Africa, saying again and again in kid-friendly ways
that the more they say yes to Jesus, the more they can expect shiny objects to
appear in front of them.
Is the distraction of the presents really enough to
distort the gospel and diminish Jesus’ position as the true and lasting gift? I’d
wager that yes, or at least a really strobg maybe. I don’t think it is OCC’s
fault, but, in our observation, this is how at least a Zambian village works. I
blame the confluence of the NGO culture and the poverty culture and the aid
culture butting up against the Christian culture, and suddenly all that stuff
we hear preached in village churches about keeping God happy and expecting
piles of good stuff makes a painful amount of sense.
Herein lies the truest danger of the shoe boxes, the subtle
communication that God barters material presents for external agreement, void
of repentance, reconciliation and relationship. And when the stuff stops
appearing and the temptations of real life send a person searching, its all to
easy to drop the Christian gig and return to familiar animism Because if God is the giver of stuff and the
stuff aint comin’ then obviously God has abandoned me and I’m going back to
what I know to be true.
Would it be worth sending something other than trinkets in a
box maybe? Schools or clinics or human resources maybe? Just maybe?
Feel free to keep the conversation going. What’s your take?